To me it just looks like a marketing stunt.

How will Anthropic be able to rewrite that in Rust and use it for marketing?

> There is no way to stop these so just lets get going.

Except for the times they've tried before and public outrage stopped it. So this defeatist attitude works against us.

How is CC a success when they still have to force subscribers to use it instead of it being a paid product?

Yea it's too bad these poor scrappy startups cannot afford engineers to build decent software.

> it's not an European company serving the LLM

That's a pretty big downside if data privacy and sharing is one of the main concerns.

I'd like to see some real reasoning here that is based on facts.

One of the facts is the existence of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act, in conjunction with https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2705 and https://www.nsa.gov/Signals-Intelligence/FISA/.

These improvements are quite promising and I'm looking forward to giving that a spin once it is released.

Will the Windows side for 0.17.x get some compiler improvements as well or is this Linux only?

Might not make it in time for 0.17 but there is a contributor making progress on the COFF linker: https://codeberg.org/kcbanner/zig/src/branch/coff_linker_wip

Deepseek is much cheaper so that means you spend less on CCP than on Anthropic/OpenAI. Then there are third party providers as well.

It is only allowed in unsafe blocks. As long as the unsafe blocks are few and well understood then Rust programmers can contain this to a small well defined portion of a program.

I can't tell if this comment is sarcasm or not. If you let AI run commands you don't understand (especially in production) you may end up with some nasty surprises.

With a comment like that, it's no wonder you're dramatically below our minimum guidance for tokens consumed.

If AI breaks production this way, you just tell AI to fix it! And look, now you've consumed tokens twice. Think on that and I'll see you at the end-of-year performance review.

  > If AI breaks production this way, you just tell AI to fix it! And look, now you've consumed tokens twice. Think on that and I'll see you at the end-of-year performance review.

it reminds me of using something like gdp as a measure where spending more money == good even if its at the cost of actually less productivity (more middlemen taking out rents, for example)

It’s not sarcastic at all. Using AI to accomplish things and fill in your knowledge gaps is literally the whole point of it. People are downvoting and salty because they thought the value in the job was in memorizing esoteric APIs (it never was)