Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | taubek's commentslogin

Somewhat. I remember that I was using Archie for finding files that were distributed via FTP. We had directories like Yahoo or DMOZ. At that time directories were the starting points for me. Internet seemed large, but not infinite.

For searching there was Altavista, Lycos, Hotbot, … Ask Jeeves was something that tried to be more that search engine. You had a feeling that now you can find all of the info and files on Internet. Google wasn’t the first one out there but it seems to me that it is the only one that survived.


I first played Pirates on C64. There was a paper version of the map that was a lot of help when you played and tried to find some locations.


Thank you for reminding me about this project. Didn’t visit it in a long time.


March 8th is International Women's Day (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Women%27s_Day).

Mother’s Day is different from country to country (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother%27s_Day)


Apparently, according to wikipedia, we have a "mother's day" in the first sunday in may. I've seen nothing in the news about it and wasn't aware of its existence.

8 March was an entirely different animal...


To me it makes things easier to read, easier to spot mistakes. But I'm not full time developer. I'm just reading code.


I wonder for how much long we will have Personal Compunitg on premise or will it move to the cloud?


For me, it never got away. Just be aware of your quality and skills.


Except if GitHub goes down the status page will also be down. Actually that is also indication of status so it kind works. :)


So technically Github is not missing a status page like this website claims: their status page is https://www.github.com .


From the page

Investigating - We are currently investigating issues for MCO and WebUI (web.teamviewer.com). Nov 21, 2025 - 09:36 CET Monitoring - Our team have implemented new mitigation measures, and the Management Console is gradually coming back online. Please note that full access for all customers may take some time. Nov 21, 2025 - 00:37 CET Update - We are continuing to investigate this issue. Nov 20, 2025 - 22:21 CET Investigating - Update - We see very high load at the affected service for login.teamviewer.com As a workaround, please use WebUI (web.teamviewer.com) Nov 20, 2025 - 22:19 CET Monitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results. Nov 20, 2025 - 18:52 CET Update - We see very high load at the affected service. As a workaround, please use WebUI (web.teamviewer.com) Nov 20, 2025 - 11:02 CET Update - We see very high load at the affected service. Both services, Management Console and Web.teamviewer.com are affected. Nov 20, 2025 - 10:12 CET Update - We see very high load at the affected service. As a workaround, please use WebUI (web.teamviewer.com) Nov 19, 2025 - 22:01 CET Investigating - We are currently investigating this issue. Nov 19, 2025 - 21:26 CET


But if you are user because of Path A, and startup midway decided to go on Path B what is your future? What if pivot isn't working for you as user?

I get it that if you are paying user you have some support or what ever.

The reason that I'm asking is this: how to justify the trust in some new technology devolved by startup? How can I convince decision makers that this is the way to go when 1 in 10 startups fail.


I think it really depends on how big of a pivot and how good they were pre-pivot.

Rockmelt made one of my favorite browsers (UX-wise) in 2010-2011. A year later they pivoted to ... I don't even remember what anymore. But it wasn't at all a product I cared about.

"Betrayal"? I don't know. It just was pointless to me and I stopped using their products.

Would I have kept using their products if the new stuff they were building seemed useful to me? Yeah, I think so. They had enough credibility with me to give them a chance at another product.


Adopting technology produced by startups always comes with risk.

Advocating for using startup tech is an evaluation, risk calculation, and politics.

Is the potential benefit worth the risk? You have to decide that for yourself and then convince others. That involves presenting the problem and evidence this solution is worth investing time in, despite coming from a startup. Pilots, POCs, and presentations are helpful here, but you have to start from a problem or pain they hopefully already voice themselves. (In my experience)

I did this recently and spent a lot of political capital, adpinting Dagger to replace Docker for our image builds and CI, but also a custom CLI that wraps more of our CI process beyond just builds. We started with a POC approved by the CTO and then made a presentation to the managers of the other teams. That presentation centered around the many small paper cuts they complained about infrequently, but when shown together painted a bigger picture, to which we offered a solution that addressed many of those pains.

I still hear complaints about the move from Docker to Dagger, though it was only a piece of a larger problem and solution. Needless to say, I am unlikely to have sufficient political capital to spend on similar endeavors (which I don't foresee at this point)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: